Rheumatologie: Aktuelle Forschung

Rheumatologie: Aktuelle Forschung
Offener Zugang

ISSN: 2161-1149 (Printed)

Abstrakt

Characterisation of the Inflammatory Infiltrate in Deep Lesions of Localized Scleroderma Compared to Erythema Nodosum

Thilo Gambichler, Sarah Terras, Melanie Cisewski, Markus Stücker, Falk G. Bechara and Alexander Kreuter

Background: Involvement of deep structures, predominantly the subcutis, may occur in many subtypes of localized scleroderma (LS).

Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to characterize the inflammatory infiltrate in deep lesions of LS (DLLS) with affection of the subcutaneous fat tissue, and to compare the findings with erythema nodosum (EN).

Methods: We assessed 22 patients with DLLS lesions who predominantly suffered from limited (n=8), generalized (n=8), linear (n=4), or deep (n=2) LS. Moreover, we studied 20 patients with EN. In each patient, a spindle-shaped full thickness skin excision was performed before the initiation of any antiphlogistic or immunosuppressive treatment. Biopsy specimens were processed for routine histology and immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD15, and CD68.

Results: Immunohistology of DLLS did not reveal CD4+ infiltrating cells. Immunolabelling for CD3, CD8, and CD68 was significantly higher in lesional skin of EN patients as compared to patients with DLLS. CD20 protein expression did not significantly differ between DLLS and EN. CD15 was negative in DLLS as well as EN. An analysis of LS subtypes did not reveal significant differences with regard to immunolabelling for the markers assessed.

Conclusions: DLLS may occur in many LS subtypes and appears to be immunohistologically characterized by an inflammatory infiltrate consisting of CD3+, CD8+, and CD68+ cells and the absence of CD4+ T lymphocytes. DLLS can be differentiated from EN showing significantly more infiltrating CD3+, CD8+, and CD68+ cells.

Haftungsausschluss: Diese Zusammenfassung wurde mithilfe von Tools der künstlichen Intelligenz übersetzt und wurde noch nicht überprüft oder verifiziert.
Top